Knox Church

A worshipping and reconciling community centred on Jesus Christ, where ALL are welcome.

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Sermon for Reformation Sunday: Rev. Dr. Peter Matheson, Guest Preacher

“Radical Evil demands Radical Change.”

Reading:  Micah 3: 5-12.  


Why do we engage with the past?  
Well, there are the friendly ghosts.   I  often look up at  the rafters  of  this  church  and  sense, caught up there,   the prayers and hopes, doubts  and despairs  of  all the generations before us every reach of human emotion.   We are not alone.

But the reason I want to focus on today   is that we learn from the past about the dynamics of change.

I’ll never forget my  desolation, in my  teaching days  at  Knox trying to get across to  a  class  of  future  ministers my conviction that after  Hiroshima, after  Auschwitz,  nothing could  ever  be the same again; remembering my father  speaking to the first ever anti-nuclear  march in Dunedin   in front of  Marama  Hall  in 1959 and saying: There  are limits  which we  cannot  transgress if we want to  remain  human;   We  have  transgressed them. 
And Auschwitz   - symbolic of the fact that any atrocity imaginable has become banal reality in our midst
And  this  student  voice  from the Heartland; but,  Peter,  these  are all  European obsessions;  they don’t  concern us…

We live in a presentist age where nothing matters except the latest fad or sensation.  “History is bunk”, as Henry Ford said, and most of our media and politicians today seem to agree.
One corollary of this is that radical evil, as the philosophers call it, can be dismissed. Another corollary is that anything like radical change is impossible.

The Reformation, or rather reformations, of the 16th century - catholic, Lutheran, Calvinist, Radical,   diagnosed the situation of church and society as radically evil, requiring root and branch change.   
Anticlericalism one sign of this, apocalyptic horizons the other.

Anticlericalism  a people’s movement; not just a few lonely geniuses like Luther; directed not  against the sexual and other  abuses of the  clergy  so much at their grab on power over  body and soul;

The Reformations went arm in arm with one of the liveliest movements of the arts and sciences Europe has ever seen; humanism. Religious renewal tends to flow as one tributary accompanying many others of the human spirit

Apocalyptic. Evil, as the prophet Micah the evangelist Matthew say, has crept right into the heart of religion, the synagogue, the church.   The pope, as Luther put it, has become Antichrist. The beast of Revelation is taking us over and now sits in the holy place.  
Open your  eyes,  says  the  reformer, Argula  von Grumbach in 1524 ,  She’d have  enjoyed  Bob Dylan’s: The times, they are changing. The cautious Regensburg magistrates had closed down the printing shops to avoid offending the emperor and the bishops.  Closed down dissent. Put the lid on the word of God, as far as Argula was concerned.  So she, a woman, a laywoman, did the unthinkable. Put her life on the line.  Spoke out against all this.

Woman and, as she said, peasants wising up.   Note that this utopian hopefulness helped to spark off the Peasants’ War, the greatest social upheaval in Europe before the French Revolution. 
Lesson two:  Religious reformation tends to be inseparable from the quest for freedom and human dignity. 

Reformation, means engaging with the troublesome God of all truth and all justice.

Radical Evil.   Creeping right into the heart of our most sacred institutions.  These days,  chopping wood, digging the  garden, my back gets  sore  quickly;   I  realize  I  am stiffening  up, getting  old.  Institutions, too, stiffen up, get old. Lose the place.  Have to be subverted.

one  sign  of  this evil is  the double tongue:  the  radical  preacher,  Thomas Müntzer,  quoting our passage,  Micah  3, points to the hypocrisy of  those  who  flay and fleece  the poor  farm worker, tradesman and  everything that  breathes,    but  want  to be  tough on crime.  Whom do we trust?  To whom has God given   the Spirit??

Crisis of authority.  Whom do we believe? The Reformations remind us that every institution is fallible, popes, councils, bishops, presbyteries, ministers like myself. 

And note the corollary. Trust the layperson. Trust the peasant.  Trust the woman.
Trust the little people. But  as  for  me,  says  Micah,  I am filled  with power,  with the spirit of the  Lord.

Our most sacred institutions full of dry rot, corrupted. Is democracy itself a lost cause in our instant gratification society?   Micah is on about politicians as much as about priests.   Whom do we trust, pre-election 2011?
We used to say:  safe as the Bank of England, Who trusts bankers today?  Meanwhile   the young  people of  Athens, and  Madrid  and  in our own Octagon  make  their  protest?  The little people.

What’s the answer to radical evil?

The reformations were fired by a vision of a simpler church, a godlier world.  But they offered no slick solutions, no cut and dried programmes

We start with God. We start  with  our  obsession with ourselves The unpalatable  message  of  a  Luther  is  that  there is no way around despair, doubt.  We are far too smart to be educable.   Far too clever at finding a thousand reasons to stick in the rut of our comfortable   thinking. The reality of what Micah is on about: structural injustice. How to we face that?
How are we redeemed from that? Je gelehrter, je verkehrter.  A proverbial saying at the time:  “The more learned, the more perverted. “ An awful warning to us professors!  We have to be like a fish, says Müntzer, and dive down into the black, dark depths Nice, liberal common sense will get us nowhere.  Never has.

Doubt is healthy for faith.

Atul Gawand  has written a marvellous  book, Complications,  about combatting the horrendous proportion of  medical misdiagnoses  and surgical  mishaps;  one of his many positive  observations  being that  medical professionals are becoming much more  ready  to say:  I  do not  know.   An acknowledgement of limits and of mystery.

In his protest against the all-knowing academic theology of the time, rational through and through Luther said crisply:  Philosophy is a whore.  Our access to  God is  not by  logic-chopping, not  by our right  thinking  and right  acting  but is  always  the miracle  of  gift, faith in the  child in the manger.  In God stretching out to us…

So it’s a scary thing to be a preacher.  To be a Christian.   For our deepest  intuitions  pattern  reality according  to what  is  emotionally convenient to us, to our inordinate affections.( Loyola) The Jesuits  knew this, and used all the resources of  imagination, will, reason,  to nudge would be disciples out of  their emotional rut. .  How do we give room for the spirit of God to work in the abyss of our souls?

If  I’m  sure  I’m right, you  know I’m  wrong.!
 
I’ve used the two jargon terms, anticlericalism and apocalyptic.  Anticlericalism was not about the sexual deviancy of priests, but about the misuse of power by the clergy Puncturing the arrogance of power.   Any greater challenge today?

Apocalyptic an insistence  on the grand  narrative; an awareness that there  is  a  awesome battle  going on;  between  infinite good  and  radical evil.  Let us fight chivalrously against the enemies of God and he will slay them with the breath of his mouth.  The word of God must be our weapon. We must not hit out with weapons, but love our neighbour.   Argula again.

One last jargon word for you:  recapitulation. Meaning a sort of genial harvesting of the past. To question present priorities.  We integrate, as the psychologists say, by first disintegrating the false synthesis.   To remember the past means to dismember our present selves. Confronting stuff!

So, we Christians go forward by first going backward.  As the prophets went back to Moses; as Jesus went back to the prophets, Paul to Jesus, Augustine and Luther to Paul. We to Argula.

Each recovery of the rock from which we are hewn, is of course, a rediscovery.  Traditionalism, the dead faith of the present, forgets that. All fundamentalisms forget that.   Tradition, the living faith of   the dead, offers us new possibilities of being.

What wonderful German Jesus speaks, said the weaver Utz Rychssner in Augsburg, reading the gospels in his own language for the first time.  He, too, went back to basics. AMEN.








Saturday, October 22, 2011

Sermon for 23 October 2011 (Pentecost 19)

Readings: 1 Thessalonians 2:1-8; Matthew 22:34-40

One of the web sites I visit regularly in my preparation of sermons is one entitled “Journey with Jesus.”  This week, a guest essay was posted, written by the Very Reverend Dr Jane Shaw, Dean of Grace Cathedral, San Francisco.  Her ideas and words have informed my sermon this morning.
Dr Shaw tells how recently she had attended a poetry reading, given by the American poet Mary Oliver. “In the question and answer session afterwards” Shaw writes, Mary Oliver “talked about the ordinary despair so many people feel in the face of the enormity of the world’s problems. ‘What can one individual do?’ she asked.”[1]
That question continues to be posed throughout the world.  Attempts to deal with this powerlessness and despair are springing up in Wall Street, Dale Farm[2], Greece, Melbourne and even here in the Octagon - as protestors express deep dissatisfaction that the vast majority of the world is being kept in poverty, while national and global politics are being driven by money and profits. 
Another of my weekly web-site visits includes news from the Council for World Mission, in whose family we, the PCANZ belong.  Here, I learn what I have not heard on the news, that these protests are also active in Taiwan, where last week there were two 44 hour hunger strikes.  Wu Tao-chang, CEO of a [Taiwanese] local corporation and a Presbyterian elder, [spoke out for the various] "Occupy" protests around the world expressing his deep concern that capitalism had gone out of control in recent years.[3]
Demonstrators [in Taipei] denounced the government for allowing banks to charge exorbitant rates in revolving credit card loans, resulting in many people being trapped in debt.
They demanded [changes in laws relating to loans.] Elder Lin Yung-song, a lawyer from Chinan Presbyterian Church, [arguing] the economic disparity between rich and poor is fundamentally a structural problem, contrasted the extremely low wages for the working class with the cuts in inheritance tax from 50% to 10% for the richest class.  A nation's progress is not only determined by its technological and economic advancement, said Lin, but rather, by how its lowliest people are cared for and treated."[4]
“Listen to your life” theologian Frederick Buechner[5] urges.  “See it for the fathomless mystery that it is.  In the boredom and the pain of it no less than the excitement and gladness: touch, taste, smell your way to the holy and hidden heart of it because in the last analysis all moments are key moments, and life itself is grace.”  As we listen to this growing discontent within the life of the world, touching, tasting, smelling our way towards the holy, hidden heart of it all, we hear resounding once more, poet Mary Oliver’s question, but “what can one person do?” 
Grace Cathedral’s Dean, Jane Shaw reminds us that the context of this morning’s gospel is that of the Pharisees testing Jesus.  “But perhaps”, she writes, “the one who approached Jesus in this week's gospel had a similar feeling of being overwhelmed when he asked him, "Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” — for there were 613 precepts in the Torah. How was a person to keep track of them all, let alone prioritize them? Jesus answers with two positive commandments from the Torah: “You shall love the Lord your God” (Deuteronomy 6: 5) and “You shall love your neighbour as yourself” (Leviticus 19: 18). “On these two commandments hang the whole Law and the Prophets.”
Mary Oliver, Shaw suggests “may have answered her own question, as Jesus answered the Pharisee’s, by testifying to the power of love”.  The opening lines of her poem “Wild Geese” proclaim:
You do not have to be good.
You do not have to walk on your knees
for a hundred miles through the desert, repenting.
You only have to let the soft animal of your body love what it loves.
The power and potential for this love was in evidence in the Wall Street protest.  American playwright Eve Ensler, commenting on the Wall Street protestors after she had talked to many of them, wrote in the Huffington Post:
"So I came out to face this contradiction: the dehumanization of poverty and the exploitation of capitalism. A block away from the park where the second General Assembly was being held, I heard the words "I love you." The words were as swift as the man who said them, for when I looked back he was already five paces away. But they were as firm as those paces — heavy with determination, purpose, depth. His words permeated the air... Love was EVERYWHERE!"
“But what does this ‘love stuff’ mean? Dr Shaw asks.  “Isn’t it, too, rather amorphous when we are trying to address the world’s needs?
As we conclude our morning worship here at Knox, we are sent out with the words “Go in peace”.  In our response, “We go in the name of Christ”, we affirm our commitment to spend the week ahead in loving and serving as Jesus did.   These words are shorthand for, what the sixteenth century mystic Teresa of Avila put so eloquently:
Christ has no body but yours,
No hands, no feet on earth but yours,
Yours are the eyes with which [Christ] looks compassion on this world,
Yours are the feet with which [Christ] walks to do good,
Yours are the hands, with which [Christ] blesses all the world.
Yours are the hands, yours are the feet,
Yours are the eyes, you are [Christ’s] body.
Christ has no body now on earth but yours.[6]
Going in the name of Christ – going to love God and love our neighbour as ourselves – demands of us some careful thought and consideration.  What does this mean for us – and our relationship with the whole of life – as we seek the holy hidden heart of it all?
“Christianity has always had a paradoxical attitude to the world, and the doctrine of the Incarnation bears it out. On the one hand, God so loved the world that God [dwells in our midst healing the sick, feeding the poor, releasing the captives, making friends especially with] those on the margins of society. On the other hand, those actions of Jesus meant he eventually came into conflict with the world, as he challenged human priorities and institutions.
“As a consequence, many Christians have had a negative view of the world. Some... have chosen to stay away from it, building separate, gathered, utopian communities. They would agree with the author of the epistle to Diognetus, in the middle of the second century, that Christians “live in their own countries, but only as resident aliens.”
“Other Christians have assumed that the world is a very bad place, ... but they are committed to making it more ‘godly,’ chiefly by converting as many people as possible to Christianity. For them, individual sinners must be saved in order to redeem the world.
“Yet other Christians still assume that the world is a bad place, but believe that Christians can make it better: we can build the kingdom of heaven on earth. These Christians do not withdraw from the world, nor do they simply try to grow their own ranks. They get their hands dirty to change things. This perspective has provided the impetus for many wonderful projects, but it has, at times, been paternalistic, assuming still that Christianity has all the answers.
“But what if loving our neighbour means that we need to listen to the world and engage with it? What if we realize we do not need to bring Christ to the world, because Christ is already in the world? This creates a different model of loving our neighbour, which is much more about Christians being vulnerable, listening, participating.”[7] And if this were the way of Christ, then what might that mean for us and our attitude to those camping out in the Octagon and in other places of the world?  How might we be loving, vulnerable, listening and participating with our Dunedin neighbours – as well as those in Taipei, the USA and the UK?   
“What can one person do?”
          You do not have to be good.
You do not have to walk on your knees
for a hundred miles through the desert, repenting.
You only have to let the soft animal of your body love what it loves.
Let’s give the last words to Franciscan Richard Rohr:  “If you are truly capable of loving one person, you’re capable of loving more than one, and eventually even your enemy, and finally all.  Love is one piece.  Love is all or nothing.  You either express love or you don’t.”



[1] “Love and Listening” The Very Reverend Dr Jane Shaw, Dean of Grace Cathedral, San Francisco.   http://www.journeywithjesus.net/index.shtml for October 23 2011
[2]Travellers may lose land to pay costs” Kevin Rawlinson, nzherald.co.nz, Saturday October 22, 2011 http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10760930
[3] "The fallouts of such extremism driven by greed are global apathy against corporations, ever increasing economic gap between rich and poor, and a global recession.” CWM News item
[4] CWM News item: 20 Oct 2011 “Hunger strikers protest Taiwan rich–poor divide” http://www.cwmission.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2549:hunger-strikers-protest-taiwan-richpoor-divide&catid=8:news&Itemid=256
[5] Frederick Buechner Now and Then http://www.spiritualityandpractice.com/teachers/teachers.php?id=215&g=1

[6] “Christ has no body” Teresa of Avila (1515–1582)
[7] Jane Shaw

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Sermon for October 16, 2011 (Pentecost 18)

Readings: Exodus 33:12-23; Matthew 22:15-22

“Ten reasons why the All Blacks can’t lose” was the front page headline in yesterday’s paper[1]. Reason number 1: “The match is being played at Eden Park”. Reason number 2: In Richie – and Izzie – we trust.  You might like to know reason number 4 and reason number 7 (they’re the same as the first reason):  “The match is being played at Eden Park”.  Yes, we hold hope high in the New Zealand camp – hope, based on the team, and strongly boosted by past history.   (In case you didn’t read it, reason number 10 reiterates this confidence: “Did we mention the match is being played at Eden Park?”)   

Further down on the front page, reality has set in; we learn there is one good reason why the All Blacks might lose tonight:   “It’s a Rugby World Cup Semi-Final - against Australia”.  Yes, we know in our heart of hearts, there is a chance we’ll lose, even as we hold the hope high.  For the other team – our close friends, arch-rivals and neighbours – also come with skilled players and a confident history.   There’s no guarantee we will win, but we will continue to dare hope.  We also know that even when things become tough, even when we might suffer a devastating loss, our human condition, with its apparently inbuilt tendency toward yearning for a better outcome, almost guarantees that hope will eventually return.

The chance of losing is even higher in that other all-black drama playing out on our shores, as the stricken ship the Rena spills and spreads its debris and toxic contamination throughout the spectacularly beautiful and bountiful Bay of Plenty.  At this stage, hope can only be held for minimising the impacts of this disaster.  The ongoing consequences from loss of life, loss of ecosystems and loss of livelihoods will continue long after the siren ends tonight’s game.  And yet, we still recognise the powerful hope demonstrated by the thousands who have swung into action, determined to save wild-life, to contain the disaster, to clean-up the mess, to seek restoration.

This see-sawing hopeful-hopelessness, or hopeless-hopefulness, is the reality of our lives.  Always, there are before us moments of great joy and possibility; and always, there are moments of despairing sorrow and emptiness.  This is the “strange land” [2] about which we have sung this morning. It’s a changing land, a place where we cannot be confident that things will go our way; it’s a place where we are called to sing God’s song even as “the boundaries shift”, “the lines delete” and “the old worlds wither away and die.”

The story of our Hebrew ancestors, part of our ancient memory bank, provides another glimpse of those who struggle with hope and hopelessness in strange, painful and alien times.  Today’s reading, yet again, provides another account of a recurring pattern found in our faith story: even when it seems that God has abandoned us, the people discover again and again, glimpses of God’s constant presence. Of course the glimpses change.  The kind of God imagined and experienced by another era, another people, may change; the expression and description of that God’s presence may change; but we dare to place our hope in the Eternal, Holy Mystery of Love that always surrounds us.

Today, as we come to our annual meeting, we stand in a place of change, wondering how we might sing God’s song even as the boundaries continue to shift.  Sometimes we find it difficult to find hope - as that which used to be so secure, is now different and not always so easy to understand.

There have been some significant changes over this past year.  Perhaps the biggest has been the shift from a Session to a Church Council.  Within the long and proud history of this Church, the Kirk Session has been a valued institution; eldership has been held in high regard.  In an earlier period, in the 1970’s I think it was, there was an attempt to change to a Parish Council.  But there was only limited success in that venture, and after a short period, governance reverted once more to Session.  One of the things I was asked to do, when I came to Knox Church six years ago, was to assist this congregation to establish more efficient and up-to-date processes for administration and management.  I was also told that the church was looking for someone with the ability to create and lead a vibrant and united ministry team within the congregation.[3]  Over recent years, the Session has expended much energy on working with me on these areas.  This time last year, that work came to fruition with a new structure of governance.  Instead of monthly meetings of different combinations of perhaps 20 of the 50 or so eligible elders – now we have a Council of 13 elected elders – elected by the congregation for a three year term.  These people have made a significant commitment and have attended our meetings regularly.  The Council is working very effectively and is presently exploring ways in which future ministry at Knox will have long-term sustainability.   The monthly meetings of Council are now supplemented by quarterly meetings of the full Eldership.  While Council deals with the day to day governance, the Elders’ Forums provide a well of wisdom within which broader issues can be explored.  The balance seems to work well.  Another significant change is the way in which the work of the church – the mission, the operations, the worship, the hospitality and the education of our parish has been devolved much more to the members.  Five of the elders on Council are charged with convenorship of these broad areas of our life, centring around the goals of the congregation.  This new structure opens up the opportunity for everyone to participate in at least one of the goal areas.  This is a new strange land, in which there is the possibility for much to be effected; there’s also the possibility for it all to fall in a heap as it depends on each one of us doing our part. We now have a structure that allows the new to evolve – but whether or not that happens will depend on a developing involvement and commitment from everyone.

The Council holds much hope for the future.  But, just as the outcome for tonight’s match requires a full contribution from management, coaches and every player; just as the clean-up of the Bay of Plenty requires the expertise and practical commitment of thousands of professionals and volunteers alike, we too depend on each other to be the Body of Christ - to ensure the journey of this community into the future is one of loving, life-giving transformation.

In the end, Karl Rahner claims “all Christian doctrine really says only one thing, something quite simple and radical: the living mystery of absolute fullness, who is nameless and beyond imagination, has drawn near to us amid the tangle of our lives through Jesus and the gifts of [God’s] grace[4] even when we do not realise it, in order to be our salvation, splendour and support over the abyss.  Consequently, while the outcome of our own life and that of the world is not yet known, we can have confidence that it is an adventure held safe in God’s mercy.  Faith then becomes an act of courage.  We can dare hope.”[5]

So, let’s grasp this hope and continue our journey of adventure together – knowing there are many reasons why we might dare hold this hope – many reasons, all summed up in the words declared each Sunday: We are not alone – we are God’s beloved people.  Thanks be to God.



[1] Otago Daily Times Saturday & Sunday October 15-16, 2011
[2] “In what strange land will I sing your song, O God, my God?  To what new code must my heart belong, O God, my God? The boundaries shift as the lines delete, and the way back home is a tired beat: there are new directions to take my feet to follow you.”  Words Shirley Murray; Music Colin Gibson Hope is our Song New Zealand Hymn Book Trust #77.
[3] In “Expectations of a Minister” (from the Terms of Call and Ministry Expectations, Profile, Knox Church Dunedin 2003.)
[4] Elizabeth Johnson distinguishes between the neo-scholastic idea of “created grace” being a finite gift that removes sin and restores our relationship with God and Rahner’s idea of “uncreated grace” which “permeates the world at its inmost roots.  Not a separate thing or a special gift that shows up now and again, [but] the animating force of all of human history ... coextensive but not identical with our race, it comes to expression wherever people express their love in care for others, creative art, literature, technology, all the good critical dimensions of responsibility, and trust, even in darkness.  Uncreated grace is the Spirit of God dwelling at the heart of our existence.” P.41-42.
[5] Elizabeth A. Johnson Quest for the Living God: Mapping Frontiers in the Theology of God 2008, p.44.

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Sermon for October 9 2011

Readings:
Exodus 32:1-8a; Matthew 22:1-14

This morning’s reading from the Hebrew Scriptures provides us with an ancient story from our tradition, which echoes with connections right through to the gospel and resonating with stories we might expect to find in today’s headlines. 

While the people of Israel waited at the foot of the mountain for Moses to return from communing with God, they lost patience.  While Moses was formulating ways which would enhance community living and build them into a responsible community, the people sought alternative, less demanding ways of living, with a new leader, who fed them with instant gratification.  They turned their gold into gods and they celebrated with great feasting.

Feasting – something we all like to do – and which features in both of today’s lectionary readings ... an interesting coincidence in this month of October, in which the United Nations places an emphasis on food:  next Sunday is the UN World Food Day and 17 October marks the UN International Day for the Eradication of Poverty.  In leading up to these international days of concern about food, its use, abuse and lack thereof, this coming week is designated as the Churches' Week of Action on Food – an opportunity for Christians to act and speak out together on food justice issues.

The kin-dom of heaven is like a king who throws a wedding banquet. The invitations are out, the preparations are made, food in abundance waits for the guests – but there’s a problem; the guests won’t come.   And so, the invitations go out again – personal requests this time: look, I’ve prepared the feast, the table is set, there’s plenty of food and it’s all ready, please come.  But the invited guests, the ones chosen to enjoy this celebratory feast, have different priorities.  With more important things on their minds, they decline the invitation and pursue their own agenda.  And, even more disturbing, a significant number respond with violence; it isn’t long before the streets of the city become a killing field. That’s the parable, according to Matthew, that Jesus told.

A slight adaption:  The kin-dom of heaven is like a planet filled with every possible kind of animal and plant food, where fresh water flows with abundance, and in which humanity is invited to live, feast and celebrate.   Food in abundance is waiting for the guests.  But there’s a problem: the invited guests have their own, different priorities.

Even though there is more than enough food in this world to feed everyone, almost half the world’s population has to live each day on less than the price of a cup of coffee[1].  And if that’s too difficult to get your head around, can you even imagine how you might limit your food spend to less than $90 a week?  Some of you might well do that – but for those of us who spend more than $13 a day on food, we are the privileged 20% of this world. These are staggering figures. But I know that if I bombard you with more facts and figures, you will, like me, tune out because it’s all too overwhelming. If we’re truly honest, haven’t we already turned our hearts and minds away from what’s happening on the mountain between Moses and God – and instead, we’re already focussing on the gold we might melt down to make a god or two of our own.  Because it’s all too hard.

We don’t know what to do with the fact that people like ourselves from developed nations are consuming more than we need – that 40 percent of food produced is being wasted before it can be eaten – that two billion people in this world are severely obese and yet 700 children die every hour as a result of hunger.  We don’t know what to do with the fact that valuable food producing land is being diverted to biofuel production and that large corporates are taking over more of the food system, diverting profits from local communities and often depleting resources long term for short term gain.  We just don’t know what to do.

We may not even realise we are doing it, as we decline the invitation to the banquet of God’s kindom and pursue our own agenda – even as violence erupts around us.
It is a grim scenario, but there are people who offer convincing arguments that it can change. Organisations like Make Poverty History, the Global Poverty Project, Christian World Service and the Churches' Week of Action on Food all invite us to become aware and to encourage change.  They claim, persuasively, that collective pressure and action can make a positive change.

So, let’s dispel a few myths first:  there is enough to go round – God’s banquet is abundant.  Contrary to popular opinion, there’s plenty of food and plenty of money, if we’re willing to take the responsibility to make the right choices.  There’s enough food calories produced to feed 12 billion people – and there are less than 7 billion living in this world.  The trillions of dollars paid in 2009 to bail out banks and financial institutions would have been enough to end poverty throughout the world for fifty years! [2]  A reallocation of a tiny portion of the defence force budgets would make a substantial change to global poverty[3].

Recently, Christian World service ran a programme for youth to raise funds and develop new awareness about extreme poverty.  Young people were asked to “Live Below the Line” – at the global extreme poverty line for five days – spending only $2.25 a day on food.[4]  One of the participants reports:  “Living Below Line was a great experience. It was definitely a challenge, as it was during the last week of the first half of 2nd semester (which involved a few tests to study for!) but I’m glad I took part, and am very happy with what I’ve raised for CWS.
 I went shopping and bought: a packet of pasta, a loaf of bread, a tub of margarine, 6 eggs, can of tomatoes, can of baked beans, 2 carrots, 3 apples and a packet of cookies. While I didn’t find myself feeling too hungry, I found five days without my daily coffee and tea very difficult (I fell asleep during my 8am lecture!). Towards the end of the week the lack of variety in my meals was making me feel quite lethargic. Not having the freedom to choose what to have for lunch/decide to go out for dinner with friends really made me think of poverty not being a matter choice.”
Christian World Service[5] provides other suggestions as to how we might participate in raising awareness of these issues: from setting up a waste tracker sheet on your refrigerator, marking down how much food is thrown out and wasted each day – and, at the end of the week exploring options to reduce the waste – to involving politicians in positive moves towards the reduction of global poverty.

Some months ago, our Church Council provided its support to a suggestion that this congregation adopt partnership with the church in Myanmar as our Global Mission Project.  A commitment was made; two members of our congregation, Clare and Nicholas, will visit Myanmar in the next few months; some of us have already given generously towards their airfare.  Over the next few months, you are being invited to take an even more active role in support of this country where there is much poverty and extreme need. 

We’re being invited to participate in the feast of God’s abundance, where there is enough for everyone’s need – but, of course, not enough for our greed.  How will we respond to this invitation?  Will we take the easy way out, seeking less demanding ways of living, welcoming leaders who feed us with instant gratification, turning our gold into gods; or will we follow the way of Jesus, seeking to right the wrongs, to be generous to all and to help bring about the kin-dom of God?


[1] Almost half the world — over three billion people — live on less than $US2.50 a day. 80% has to live on less than $US10 per day. http://www.globalissues.org/article/26/poverty-facts-and-stats
[2] The $8.42 trillion promised by rich country governments to bailout banks would be enough to end global extreme poverty for 50 years and a massive step towards ending it forever, Oxfam said today ahead of the meeting of G20 leaders in London on Thursday. http://www.oxfam.org/pressroom/pressrelease/2009-04-01/bank-bailout-could-end-poverty
[3] Plummeting stock markets have wiped out 33% of the value of companies, $14.5 trillion. Taxpayers will be bailing out their banks and financial institutions with large amounts of money. US taxpayers alone will spend some $9.7 trillion in bailout packages and plans. The UK and other European countries have also spent some $2 trillion on rescues and bailout packages. More is expected. Much more. Such numbers, made quickly available, are enough to wipe many individual’s mortgages, or clear out third world debt many times over. Even the high military spending figures are dwarfed by the bailout plans to date. December 11, 2010 http://www.globalissues.org/issue/1/trade-economy-related-issues
[4] http://www.cws.org.nz/what-can-i-do/your-youth-group/2011-youth-fundraiser
[5] http://www.cws.org.nz/the-issues/food